Trump's pulling the US out of the Paris climate agreement could be disastrous for the economy

The agreement, which 195 nations signed in December 2015, set a global goal to keep the planet from warming to a level that scientists say could keep the planet from launching into a tailspin of irreversible consequences.

Trump said that he planned to renegotiate the US's position in the agreement, but the exact terms are unclear.

In explaining his decision, Trump said it was in part to save US jobs, saying that the accord "handicaps the US economy."

Economists say that while there may be some positive short-term economic effects, Trump's decision to pull out of the Paris agreement and not fight to address climate change would most likely have devastating long-term economic consequences for the US and the world.

In a paper published in Nature attempting to bring together previous findings of climate change for the economy, researchers from the University of California at Berkley and Stanford estimated that there would be serious consequences for the global economy if climate change continues at its current pace.

"If future adaptation mimics past adaptation, unmitigated warming is expected to reshape the global economy by reducing average global incomes roughly 23% by 2100 and widening global income inequality, relative to scenarios without climate change," said the paper from Marshall Burke, Solomon M. Hsiang, and Edward Miguel.

While these effects would be different in different countries around the world, the researchers estimated that US GDP between 2016 and 2099 would be 36% lower if climate trends continue, compared to a world with more stable temperatures.

This isn't to say that the other nations in the Paris accord couldn't mitigate these effects, or that Trump couldn't undertake other measures to decrease carbon emissions.

In addition to the macroeconomic effects, Trump said that the move would help to preserve jobs at power plants, coal mines, and other fossil-fuel-generating industries.

While there are still a large number of workers in the traditional fossil-fuel industries according to the Department of Energy, the number of Americans employed in energy-efficient and renewable-energy jobs is also huge.

For instance, 1.1 million Americans work in electric-power generation through traditional fossil fuels, but renewables follow closely with 880,000 employees.

Additionally, from a long-term economic perspective, shifting toward renewable energy would likely be more beneficial for job growth.

The Department of Energy said the renewable sector is booming with solar employment growing by 25% and wind-generation employment growing by 32% in 2016.

Morgan Stanley equity strategist Eva Zlotnicka said the job losses in fossil fuels would likely accelerate regardless of Trump's policies.

"As we've noted, economics are still driving, not regulation," said Zlotnicka in a note to clients after Trump's announcement. "Our energy commodities team's fundamental analysis of power generation economics shows that longer term coal cannot compete with natural gas or renewables (even on an unsubsidized basis)."

Given much of this research, a large number of business leaders spoke out against Trump's rumored decision before his announcement.

Twenty-eight major US companies — including Apple, Gap, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Morgan Stanley — took out a full-page ad in The New York Times asking Trump to stay in the Paris agreement.

Trump's pulling the US out of the Paris climate agreement could be disastrous for the economy

Enhance Your Pulse News Experience!

JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!