The plaintiff, Edgar Asamoah Boateng, card bearing member of the NDC in Abuakwa North says that the party has not been able to meet the enshrined constitutional deadlines in its constitution for the 2024 general election.
ADVERTISEMENT
NDC hit with fresh injunction ahead of May 13 presidential primaries
The presidential and parliamentary primaries of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) may hit a snag again as a fresh injunction application has been slapped against the party.
NDC
Recommended articles
He further avers among other things that, the NDC itself has been giving conflicting directives on the issuance of a register and is fueling the uncertainty surrounding the credibility of the impending elections.
Mr. Boateng adds that reluctance of the party to provide a complete and credible Photo album register ahead of time to the Presidential and parliamentary aspirants for verification smacks of a plan to create undue advantage for manipulation of the presidential and parliamentary primaries.
“Plaintiff says that the failure to provide a proper photo album of eligible voters has caused a lot of rancor and acrimony in the party. Plaintiff says that all attempts to obtain a proper phot register or album has fallen on deaf ears and all indications are that the impending internal party elections would be a disaster”, parts of the writ said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Below is the statement of claims:
Plaintiff is a citizen of Ghana, a card bearing member of the National Democratic Congress, a registered political party in Ghana.
Plaintiff is also currently contesting Parliamentary Primaries Election of the 1st Defendant party.
John Mahama and Asiedu Nketia
Pulse Ghana
Plaintiff also says his NDC party card number is F240540024 and is a member of the Abuakwa North Branch of the 1st Defendant party.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 1st Defendant is a Registered Political Party in Ghana.
The 2nd Defendant is the elected General Secretary of the ‘National Democratic Congress (NDC) and De Facto chief Executive Officer of the 1st Defendant Party.
The 3rd Defendant is the Chairman of the 1st Defendant Party.
The 4th Defendant has the mandate under the 1992 Constitution of Ghana to manage the conduct of all public Elections and referenda including all elections organized by the 1st Plaintiff says that the constitution of the 1st Defendant requires the party to elect Presidential and Parliamentary Candidates at least twenty-four (24) months to the next General Election if the President of Ghana is not a member of 1st Defendant and if the Member of Parliament in a particular constituency is not a member.
Plaintiff says that the 1st Defendant has not been able to meet the enshrined constitutional deadlines in its constitution for the 2024 general has had to reschedule the elections to 13th May 2023.
ADVERTISEMENT
Plaintiff says the failure to meet the constitutional deadlines was because of 1st Defendant’s own inefficiencies.
The Plaintiff says that he and other members of the Party from various parts of the Country filed their Nominations and were approved to contest for to be the 1st Defendant’s nominees for the Presidential and Parliamentary General Elections to be held in December 2024.
The Plaintiff adds that upon conclusion of the vetting process the members such as himself and others including the former President of the Republic were assured that all Parliamentary candidate aspirant and Presidential Candidate aspirants would be given a proper voters register devoid of all duplications, errors and dubious entries to enable all candidates partake in a free and fair election.
Plaintiff avers that particularly the 2nd Defendant assured that all candidates would be given a photographic register to enable all eligible voters to be easily identified at the election by polling agents and election officers.
The Plaintiff adds that copies of the Photo Album Register of eligible voters for the internal elections be made available at least one month before the impending internal elections to afford both Presidential and Parliamentary aspirants an opportunity to verify the accuracy of the voters register in all the branches within the two hundred and seventy-five (275) constituencies of the party as part of the processes to ensure free, fair and credible internal elections on 13th May, 2023.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Plaintiff repeats the averment in the preceding paragraph 13 of the Statement of claim hereof and adds that this measure is in compliance with best practice in modern democratic elections to ensure that the Photo Album register is complete, accurate and enhance free and fair elections and reduce disputes over election results and same is consistent with the aims and objectives of the National Democratic Congress as enshrined in Article 7 of the party’s constitution.
The Plaintiff says that the 4th Defendant in all public elections it conducts relies on this practice.
The Plaintiff adds that to his surprise, the 1st and 2nd Defendant’s have failed to provide the voters register to his (Plaintiff) representatives and all other aspirants including Presidential Aspirants.
Plaintiff says that the failure to provide a proper photo album of eligible voters has caused a lot of rancor and acrimony in the party.
Plaintiff says that as a result of the rancor and acrimony referred to above some members of the party who are also aspirants have taken legal action against the party.
ADVERTISEMENT
Plaintiff says that all attempts to obtain a proper phot register or album has fallen on deaf ears and all indications are that the impending internal party elections would be a disaster.
Plaintiff says the 1st Defendant itself has been giving conflicting directives on the issuance of a register and is fueling the uncertainty surrounding the credibility of the impending elections.
The Plaintiff maintains that the 1st and 2nd Defendants reluctance to provide a complete and credible Photo Album Register ahead of time to the Presidential and parliamentary aspirants for verification smacks of a plan to create undue advantage for manipulation of the presidential and parliamentary primaries.
WHEREFORE the Plaintiff claim against the Defendants as per the endorsement to the writ of summons.
JOIN OUR PULSE COMMUNITY!
ADVERTISEMENT
Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or:
Email: eyewitness@pulse.com.gh
Recommended articles
'Incompetent' NDC gave dumsor timetable, NPP with 'the men' is clueless - Kabutey Ocansey
Doctors miraculously save baby girl from dead mother's womb
Asogli State rejects attempts to rename Ho Technical University after Ephraim Amu
Ghanaians call for Dumsor 'demo' to urge Government end erratic power cuts
Law firm’s mistake causes wrong couple's divorce, judge says it can’t be reversed
NIA implements new fees for registration services starting May 1
Prophet Oduro slams government over dumsor: 'What kind of nonsense is this?'
2023 was the hottest year ever — the world is on red alert
