Carol Pogash

A proposal released by the board Friday no longer calls for painting over the 13 frescoes at George Washington High School called “The Life of Washington” by artist Victor Arnautoff. Instead, the proposed resolution calls for the artwork to be covered with panels or other “material, means or methods.” The measure, which the board will consider Tuesday, also says the murals would be digitized for art historians to access.

The resolution appears to be a compromise: the murals would survive but would not be visible at the school.

“If the school board adopts this, it’s worth applauding,” said Jon Golinger, executive director of the Coalition to Protect Public Art, a group of artists, historians, educators and free speech advocates who formed to save the murals. “They are taking off the table the notion of permanent destruction of these murals.”

“The Life of Washington” frescoes were painted in the mid-1930s and funded by the Works Progress Administration, a New Deal agency that provided jobs for the unemployed, including artists, during the Great Depression. Arnautoff, who was a Communist, depicted Washington in a critical light, showing him as a slave owner and a leader of the nation that annihilated Native Americans.

In June, the board voted unanimously to paint over the frescoes, saying the images were offensive to Native Americans and African Americans, some of whom pass by the paintings on their way to class.

That might have been the end of the murals, but the controversy exploded into a national and international story, with historians, politicians, educators, artists and others arguing that the board was whitewashing an important artwork, and history itself. In the past few days, the local branch of the NAACP joined the opposition.

At times, the debate devolved into angry accusations. At a meeting where Robert Cherny, author of “Victor Arnautoff and the Politics of Art,” was speaking, a protester pointed fingers at the audience and shouted, “Genocide! Genocide!”

In a news release Friday, the school board president, Stevon Cook, acknowledged there were “strong passions on both sides.”

“Where we all agree is that the mural depicts the racist history of America, especially in regards to African Americans and Native Americans,” he said in the release.

In an earlier interview, Cook said he was not “trying to erase the past,” which he said should be taught in classrooms. His objection, he said, was to the prominence of what he called “violent murals” that extend from the school’s entryway to its lobby, making it nearly impossible for students to ignore. Cook said he and the rest of the school board wanted students to “see images of themselves that inspire them and reflect who they are and what they can accomplish.”

It is unclear how the other six members of the board will respond, but the fact that the president submitted the resolution indicates that the murals have a good chance of being saved.

Amy Anderson, a parent and teacher who had led the charge to eliminate the murals, said Friday that she believed the artwork was damaging to students.

Anderson, who is Native American, said she recognized that she and her supporters were outnumbered. When asked for her response to the new resolution, Anderson said: “It’s on their conscience. As a parent, I’m not giving up on my kid and not on this until the murals are painted down.”

The other side is equally determined. Golinger, of the coalition to save the murals, said the group could live with a covering like a curtain that could be easily pulled back but would object to anything like a wall. His organization was working to place the issue on a ballot for city voters, and may still attempt to do so, he said.

“We will continue to oppose putting up an impenetrable barrier that blocks anyone from ever seeing these important works of art,” Golinger said in a news release. “It’s critical that any solution include a way for the murals to be made available for students, teachers and others to view them for educational purposes.”

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/10/arts/san-francisco-murals.html" id="952c411a-8af2-3c59-aebd-e9dd49f20720">The New York Times</a>.

San Francisco School Board May Save Controversial George Washington Mural

The San Francisco school board is reconsidering a decision to destroy a series of historic Depression-era murals depicting slaves and a dead Native American, following widespread complaints that the move amounted to censorship.

In this famously left-of-center city, liberals are battling liberals over these Depression-era frescoes that have offended some groups.

In the debate over the 13 murals that make up “The Life of Washington,” at George Washington High School, one side, which includes art historians and school alumni, sees an immersive history lesson; the other, which includes many African-Americans and Native Americans, sees a hostile environment.

Sometime this spring, the school board will make a decision about the future of the massive frescoes that extend from the school’s entryway through its lobby, confronting students as they climb the stairs to their classrooms.

The works were created in the mid-1930s by Victor Arnautoff, a social realist, for the Works Progress Administration, an agency created under Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal that provided public works jobs for the unemployed during the Great Depression.

Arnautoff, who was born in Russia and taught at Stanford, was a communist who embedded messages critical of the Founding Father in his murals. He depicted Washington, accurately, at a time when that was rarely acknowledged, as a slave owner and the leader of the nation that annihilated Native Americans. There are no cherry trees.

But to Amy Anderson, a member of the Ahkaamaymowin band of Métis who has been a catalyst in the campaign to remove the murals, they represent “American history from the colonizers’ perspective.”

Around the country in recent years, people have been questioning historical representations in public art. Confederate statues and monuments have been dismantled. And in September, San Francisco city workers removed a statue symbolizing the Catholic Church’s mission-era subjugation of Native Americans. But the Washington High frescoes present a different issue. What they symbolize is open to interpretation. Some see a subversive message about Washington’s failings; others see his glorification.

When the frescoes were painted, critics praised Arnautoff’s work. But by the late 1960s, his art aroused anger. The school district responded by adding contemporary murals by African-American artist Dewey Crumpler in 1974. The additional artwork did not satisfy Anderson and others opposed to the murals.

Stevon Cook, president of the San Francisco Board of Education, wants the paintings covered or removed. “The history we tell is very one sided,” he said. An African-American, he supports teaching this history in classrooms, but opposes “violent images that are offensive to certain communities,” he said.

Virginia Marshall, president of the San Francisco Alliance of Black School Educators said Arnautoff’s paintings remind her of “my great-great-grandfather and great-great-grandmother who were beaten and hung from trees and told they were less than human.”

Paloma Flores, a member of the Pit-River Nation and coordinator of the school’s Indian Education Program, said Arnautoff’s “intent no longer matters.” The murals “glorify the white man’s role and dismiss the humanity of other people who are still alive,” she said.

Joely Proudfit, director of the California Indian Culture and Sovereignty Center in San Marcos, said it is not worth saving the art if one native student “is triggered by that.”

Of the 2,004 students at Washington High, most are Asian-American; 89 are African-American and four are Native American. One of them is Anderson’s son, who, she said, “keeps his head down when he passes the murals.”

But scholars see something else in the murals: history. Robert W. Cherny, an emeritus professor of history at San Francisco State University and the author of “Victor Arnautoff and the Politics of Art,” points to the artist’s critique of Washington. “Arnautoff was a major artist, an artist on the left who was being very critical of Washington for owning slaves, and he was critical of the genocide of Native Americans.”

Gray Brechin, project scholar of the Living New Deal at the University of California, Berkeley, said, “It’s not a matter of erasing art, it’s erasing history itself.” He also spoke about the importance of preserving memories of atrocities. “The Jews never want what happened to them to be forgotten,” he said. “That’s why they have so many memorials.”

Washington High School has one of the largest collections of WPA art on the West Coast, but it’s still a high school. Sharing space with Arnautoff’s panels are student-drawn signs for “Walk Against Rape” and “2019 ELECTION,” which lists requirements including, “2.0 GPA ... GOOD LUCK!”

Mikayla, a sophomore who was raising money for student government, said, “It’s not necessary to hide the truth.” She had inadvertently taped her sign reading “$2 Spam musubi” over the chest of Arnautoff’s dead Native American.

Matt Haney, a member of the board of supervisors and a former board of education member, said, “If you’re a Native American student and you walk into the lobby and see your ancestors being murdered in art, that feels dehumanizing.” He also has suggested renaming the school in honor of Maya Angelou, who studied there.

Late last year the school district organized a group called the Reflections and Action Committee to consider options for the artwork.

Some art historians and Washington High School teachers who spoke to the committee in favor of the frescoes said they felt uncomfortable expressing their views. “There was a feeling of animosity in the air,” John M. Strain, an English teacher and graduate of Washington High, said. His students, he said, “feel bad about offending people but they almost universally don’t think the answer is to erase it.”

Marianne Philipp, the school librarian, also spoke because, she said, “It’s my job to champion intellectual freedom. It’s disturbing to me that this is under discussion.”

After hearing from both sides, the committee issued a statement that said the artwork “glorifies slavery, genocide, colonization, Manifest Destiny, white supremacy, oppression, etc.” and does not represent the San Francisco school’s “values of social justice.”

In February, eight committee members voted to recommend that the school district remove Arnautoff’s frescoes, two were undecided and one voted to save them. To remove them would be to destroy them because moving them would be too costly. The committee said the frescoes could be archived digitally.

Lope Yap Jr., vice president of the Washington High School Alumni Association, cast the sole vote to save the frescoes. “There are not many people whose politics are left of me,” Yap, a filmmaker, said. “If they succeed, this would be book burning in Germany in the 1930s.”

Mark Berger, a Washington High alumnus and a sound engineer, said digitizing the frescoes is not an acceptable solution. “The thing about murals is that they’re out there for anyone to see who walks by. It catches your attention. It may cause you to think about things you wouldn’t think about. It’s the artist reaching out to you rather than you seeking out the message,” he said.

Barbara A. Brewer, an English teacher at the school, assigned 49 freshmen to write essays about the frescoes. Only four favored removal. One student wrote, “The fresco shows us exactly how brutal colonization and genocide really were and are. The fresco is a warning and reminder of the fallibility of our hallowed leaders.”

The school board will take up the issue in the coming months. If it votes to destroy the murals, Yap said the alumni association would file a lawsuit to stop it.

This week, Anderson recalled a discussion she had had with her son about attending the school with the murals. “He told me, ‘Don’t worry Mom; that’s not going to be up there forever.’”

This article originally appeared in <a id="9471e593-e6af-3ff1-a25e-8fd949ee0e7c" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/arts/design/george-washington-murals-ugly-history-debated.html">The New York Times</a>.

These High School Murals Depict an Ugly History. Should They Go?

SAN FRANCISCO — In one of the murals, George Washington points westward over the dead body of a Native American. Another depicts Washington’s slaves, hunched over, working in the fields of Mount Vernon. These images aren’t in a museum exhibition but on the walls of a public high school.

These high school murals depict an ugly history, should they go?

Politics

Local

Filla

World

News

Football

Ghana Premier League

Black Stars

Sports

Celebrities

Music

Movies

Entertainment

Fashion

Beauty & Health

Relationships & Weddings

Food & Travel

Lifestyle

Domestic

International 

Business

About

Highlights

Selection Criteria

Jury

Terms And Conditions

FAQs

Pulse Influencer Awards

Explore categories

Pulse Ghana is the most followed news and entertainment platform, informing and engaging young Ghanaians round the clock, providing updates by the hour.

Carol Pogash

Articles written by the author

San Francisco School Board May Save Controversial George Washington Mural

These high school murals depict an ugly history, should they go?