Jennifer Medina and Katie Benner

Thirty-three parents were charged in the case, and prosecutors said there could be additional indictments to come. Also implicated were top college coaches, who were accused of accepting millions of dollars to help admit students to Wake Forest, Yale, Stanford, the University of Southern California and other schools, regardless of their academic or sports ability, officials said.

The parents included television star Lori Loughlin and her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli; actress Felicity Huffman; and William E. McGlashan Jr., a partner at the private equity firm TPG, officials said.

The case unveiled Tuesday was stunning in its breadth and audacity. It was the Justice Department’s largest ever college admissions prosecution, a sprawling investigation that involved 200 agents nationwide and resulted in charges against 50 people in six states.

The charges also underscored how college admissions have become so cutthroat and competitive that some have sought to break the rules. Authorities say the parents of some of the nation’s wealthiest and most privileged students sought to buy spots for their children at top universities, not only cheating the system but also potentially cheating other hardworking students out of a chance at a college education.

“The parents are the prime movers of this fraud,” Andrew E. Lelling, U.S. attorney for the district of Massachusetts, said Tuesday during a news conference. Lelling said those parents used their wealth to create a separate and unfair admissions process for their children.

But, Lelling said, “there will not be a separate criminal justice system” for them.

“The real victims in this case are the hardworking students,” who were displaced in the admissions process by “far less qualified students and their families who simply bought their way in,” Lelling said.

“This is an extreme, unsubtle and illegal example of the increasingly common practice of using money to get an edge in the race for a place in an elite university,” said Chris Hunt, who runs College Essay Mentor, a consulting service for applicants. “The more common practice is to spend money in indirect ways: High-priced test prep. Coaches so your kid can be a recruited athlete. Donations as an alum. Donations as a nonalum.”

At the center of the sweeping financial crime and fraud case was William Singer, founder of a college preparatory business called the Edge College &amp; Career Network, also known as The Key. Federal prosecutors did not charge any students or universities with wrongdoing.

Authorities said Singer, who has agreed to plead guilty to the charges and cooperated with federal prosecutors, used The Key and its nonprofit arm, Key Worldwide Foundation, which is based in Newport Beach, California, to help students cheat on their standardized tests and to pay bribes to the coaches who could get them into college with fake athletic credentials.

Singer used The Key as a front, allowing parents to funnel money into an account that would not have to pay federal taxes.

Parents paid Singer about $25 million from 2011 until February 2019 to bribe coaches and university administrators to designate their children as recruited athletes, which effectively ensured their admission, according to the indictment.

Singer is also accused of bribing Division 1 athletic coaches to tell admissions officers that they wanted certain students, even though the students did not have the necessary athletic credentials.

Most elite universities recruit student athletes and use different criteria to admit them, often with lower grades and standardized test scores than other students. Admissions officers typically set aside a number of spots in each freshman class for coaches to recruit students to their teams.

“At each of the universities the admissions prospects of recruited athletes are higher — and in some cases significantly higher — than those of nonrecruited athletes with similar grades and standardized test scores,” the indictment said.

Singer also helped parents go to great lengths to falsely present their children as the sort of top-flight athletes that coaches would want to recruit.

Singer fabricated athletic “profiles” of students to submit with their applications, which contained teams the students had not played on and fake honors they had not won. Some parents supplied “staged photographs of their children engaged in athletic activity,” according to the authorities, and Singer’s associates also photoshopped the faces of the applicants onto images of athletes found on the internet.

In one example detailed in an indictment, the parents of a student applying to Yale paid Singer $1.2 million to help her get admitted. The student, who did not play soccer, was described as the co-captain of a prominent club soccer team in Southern California in order to be recruited for the Yale women’s soccer team. The coach of the Yale soccer team was bribed at least $400,000 to recruit the student.

“This girl will be a midfielder and attending Yale so she has to be very good,” Singer wrote in an email detailing instructions, adding that he would need “a soccer pic probably Asian girl.”

After the profile was created, Singer sent the fake profile to Rudolph Meredith, head coach of the women’s soccer team at Yale, who then designated her as a recruit, even though he knew the student did not play competitive soccer, according to the complaint.

In its investigation, known internally as Operation Varsity Blues, the government focused on the role that it said the 33 indicted parents played in a scandal that also ensnared two standardized test administrators, a test proctor, and more than a dozen coaches at top schools, including the University of Texas at Austin and the University of California.

Those parents were willing to pay between $15,000 and $75,000 per test, which went to college entrance exam administrators who helped their children cheat on them by giving them answers, correcting their work or even letting third parties falsely pose as their children and take the tests in their stead, according to the indictment.

Singer instructed at least one parent, McGlashan, the partner at TPG, to claim that his son had learning disabilities in order to gain extended time for him to take his college entrance exam alone, over two days instead of one, according to court documents.

The government said that McGlashan’s son was told to take the exam at one of two test centers where Singer worked with test administrators who had been bribed to allow students to cheat — one in Houston and one in West Hollywood, California. And Singer told McGlashan to fabricate a reason, such as a wedding, for why their children would need to take the test in one of those locations.

Prosecutors said that the students were often not aware that their parents were doctoring their test scores and lying to get them into school. McGlashan’s son was unaware of the scheme, according to court documents.

A spokesman for McGlashan and for TPG did not respond to an email seeking comment.

When Singer explained the scheme last June to Gordon R. Caplan, co-chairman of the global law firm Willkie Farr &amp; Gallagher, Caplan laughed and said, “And it works?” according to a transcript of a recorded phone conversation between the two men captured in a court-authorized wiretap.

During the phone call, Singer told Caplan that nearly 800 other families had used what he called “side doors” to get their children into college. “What we do is we help the wealthiest families in the U.S. get their kids into school,” Singer said. “They want guarantees, they want this thing done.”

“There is a front door which means you get in on your own,” Singer told Caplan. “The back door is through institutional advancement, which is 10 times as much money. And I’ve created this side door in.”

Singer told Caplan that his daughter wouldn’t know that her standardized test scores had been faked.

“Nobody knows what happens,” Singer said, according to the transcript of the call. “She feels great about herself. She got a test a score and now you’re actually capable for help getting into a school. Because the test score’s no longer an issue. Does that make sense?”

A spokeswoman for Caplan and Willkie Farr did not respond to an email seeking comment.

Lelling, the U.S. attorney, said that the first lead in the case came when the target of an entirely separate investigation gave prosecutors a tip that the bribery and cheating might be occurring.

Universities were quick to respond Tuesday. According to the indictment, Stanford University’s head sailing coach, John Vandemoer, took financial contributions to the sailing program from an intermediary in exchange for agreeing to recommend two prospective students for admission.

Stanford said Tuesday that Vandemoer had been fired.

“Neither student came to Stanford,” the statement said. “However, the alleged behavior runs completely counter to Stanford’s values.”

In a tweet, USC Trojans, the official Twitter account of the University of Southern California athletic department, said that the university was cooperating with the government’s investigation.

It said the university was identifying any funds received in connection with the scheme, an apparent reference to bribery. And it said the university would “take employment actions as appropriate” and was reviewing its admissions process to make sure that nothing like this could happen in the future.

In a letter to the university community, Wanda M. Austin, interim president of the University of Southern California, said, “It is immensely disappointing that individuals would abuse their position at the university this way.”

Austin said she did not believe that admissions officers were aware of the scheme or took part in it, and she described the university as a victim.

“The federal government has alleged that USC is a victim in a scheme perpetrated against the university by a longtime Athletics Department employee, one current coach and three former coaching staff,” she said.

In an interview, Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, a college and university trade group, said, “If these allegations are true, they violate the essential premise of a fair and transparent college admissions process.”

Those Charged in the Admissions Cheating Scandal

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/us/college-cheating-scandal.html" id="7592e151-2134-3c0d-a2ef-e0d6a7ca8b37">The New York Times</a>.

College Admissions Scandal: Actresses, Business Leaders and Other Wealthy Parents Charged

Federal prosecutors charged dozens of people Tuesday in a major college admissions scandal that involved wealthy parents, including Hollywood celebrities and prominent business leaders, paying bribes to get their children into elite American universities.

Thirty-three parents were charged in the case. Also implicated were top college coaches, who were accused of accepting millions of dollars to help admit students to Wake Forest, Yale, Stanford, the University of Southern California and other schools, regardless of their academic or sports ability, officials said.

Along with Hollywood stars Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, those charged included prominent business leaders, a fashion designer and a top lawyer, as well as exam administrators accused of manufacturing students’ achievements and private admissions counselors accused of coordinating it all, officials said.

“The parents are the prime movers of this fraud,” Andrew E. Lelling, U.S. attorney for the district of Massachusetts, said Tuesday during a news conference. Lelling said that those parents used their wealth to create a separate and unfair admissions process for their children.

At the center of the sweeping financial crime and fraud case was William Rick Singer, founder of a college preparatory business called the Edge College &amp; Career Network, also known as The Key.

Lelling said that Huffman participated in the SAT cheating portion of the scam.

Singer also bribed Division 1 athletic coaches to tell admissions officers that they wanted certain students, even though the students did not have the necessary athletic credentials.

Lelling said that the first lead in the case came when the target of an entirely separate investigation gave prosecutors a tip that the bribery and cheating might be occurring.

It was the Justice Department’s largest-ever college admissions prosecution, a sprawling investigation that involved 200 agents nationwide and resulted in charges against 50 people in six states.

Lelling said Huffman participated in the SAT cheating portion of the scam.

Along with Hollywood stars Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, those charged included prominent business leaders, a fashion designer and a top lawyer, officials said.

It was the Justice Department’s largest ever college admissions prosecution, a sprawling investigation that involved 200 agents nationwide and resulted in charges against 50 people in six states.

“The parents are the prime movers of this fraud,” Andrew E. Lelling, the U.S. attorney for the District of Massachusetts, said Tuesday during a news conference. Lelling said that those parents used their wealth to create a separate and unfair admissions process for their children.

"The real victims in this case are the hardworking students,” who were displaced in the admissions process by “far less qualified students and their families who simply bought their way in,” Lelling said.

At the center of the sweeping financial crime and fraud case was William Rick Singer, the founder of a college preparatory business called the Edge College &amp; Career Network, also known as The Key.

Actresses and Business Leaders  Charged in College Admissions Bribery Scandal

<h1>Federal prosecutors charged dozens of people Tuesday in a major college admissions scandal that involved wealthy parents, including Hollywood celebrities and prominent business leaders, paying bribes to get their children into elite American universities.</h1>

In many of the cases, prosecutors said, the students were often not aware that their parents were doctoring their test scores and lying to get them into school.

“This is an extreme, unsubtle and illegal example of the increasingly common practice of using money to get an edge in the race for a place in an elite university,” said Christopher Hunt, who runs College Essay Mentor, a consulting service for applicants. “The more common practice is to spend money in indirect ways: High-priced test prep. Coaches so your kid can be a recruited athlete. Donations as an alum. Donations as a nonalum.”

Singer is also accused of bribing Division I athletic coaches to tell admissions officers that they wanted certain students, even though the students did not have the necessary athletic credentials.

“At each of the universities, the admissions prospects of recruited athletes are higher — and in some cases significantly higher — than those of nonrecruited athletes with similar grades and standardized test scores,” the indictment said.

McGlashan’s son was unaware of the scheme, according to court documents.

Those Charged in the Admissions Cheating Scandal

This article originally appeared in <a id="604b0ef2-c669-4c95-bd2f-a2f8dbc72c15" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/us/college-cheating-scandal.html">The New York Times</a>.

The parents included television star Lori Loughlin and her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli; actress Felicity Huffman; and William E. McGlashan Jr., a partner at the private equity firm TPG, officials said.

College admissions scandal: Actresses, business leaders and other wealthy parents charged

Politics

Local

Filla

World

News

Football

Ghana Premier League

Black Stars

Sports

Celebrities

Music

Movies

Entertainment

Fashion

Beauty & Health

Relationships & Weddings

Food & Travel

Lifestyle

Domestic

International 

Business

About

Highlights

Selection Criteria

Jury

Terms And Conditions

FAQs

Pulse Influencer Awards

Explore categories

Pulse Ghana is the most followed news and entertainment platform, informing and engaging young Ghanaians round the clock, providing updates by the hour.

Jennifer Medina and Katie Benner

Articles written by the author

College Admissions Scandal: Actresses, Business Leaders and Other Wealthy Parents Charged

College Admissions Scandal: Actresses, Business Leaders and Other Wealthy Parents Charged

College Admissions Scandal: Actresses, Business Leaders and Other Wealthy Parents Charged

Actresses and Business Leaders Charged in College Admissions Bribery Scandal

Actresses and Business Leaders Charged in College Admissions Bribery Scandal

College admissions scandal: Actresses, business leaders and other wealthy parents charged