Katie Benner and Adam Goldman

Justice Department officials have shifted an administrative review of the Russia investigation closely overseen by Attorney General William Barr to a criminal inquiry, according to two people familiar with the matter. The move gives the prosecutor running it, John Durham, the power to subpoena for witness testimony and documents, to impanel a grand jury and to file criminal charges.

The opening of a criminal investigation is likely to raise alarms that Trump is using the Justice Department to go after his perceived enemies. Trump fired James Comey, the FBI director under whose watch agents opened the Russia inquiry, and has long assailed other top former law enforcement and intelligence officials as partisans who sought to block his election.

Trump has made clear that he sees the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. That view factors into the impeachment investigation against him, as does his long obsession with the origins of the Russia inquiry. House Democrats are examining in part whether his pressure on Ukraine to open investigations into theories about the 2016 election constituted an abuse of power.

The move also creates an unusual situation in which the Justice Department is conducting a criminal investigation into itself.

Barr’s reliance on Durham, a widely respected and veteran prosecutor who has investigated CIA torture and broken up Mafia rings, could help insulate the attorney general from accusations that he is doing the president’s bidding and putting politics above justice.

It was not clear what potential crime Durham is investigating, nor when the criminal investigation was prompted. A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.

Trump is certain to see the criminal investigation as a vindication of the years he and his allies have spent trying to discredit the Russia investigation. In May, Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity that the FBI officials who opened the case — a counterintelligence investigation into whether his campaign conspired with Moscow’s election sabotage — had committed treason.

“We can never allow these treasonous acts to happen to another president,” Trump said. He has called the FBI investigation one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history.

Federal investigators need only a “reasonable indication” that a crime has been committed to open an investigation, a much lower standard than the probable cause required to obtain search warrants. However, “there must be an objective, factual basis for initiating the investigation; a mere hunch is insufficient,” according to Justice Department guidelines.

When Barr appointed Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, to lead the review, he had only the power to voluntarily question people and examine government files.

Barr expressed skepticism of the Russia investigation even before joining the Trump administration. Weeks after being sworn in this year, he said he intended to scrutinize how it started and used the term “spying” to describe investigators’ surveillance of Trump campaign advisers. But he has been careful to say he wants to determine whether investigators acted lawfully.

“The question is whether it was adequately predicated,” Barr told lawmakers in April. “And I’m not suggesting that it wasn’t adequately predicated. But I need to explore that.”

Barr began the administrative review of the Russia investigation in May, saying that he had conversations with intelligence and law enforcement officials that led him to believe that the FBI acted improperly, if not unlawfully.

The FBI opened the investigation in late July 2016, code-named Crossfire Hurricane, after receiving information from the Australian government that a Trump campaign adviser had been approached with an offer of stolen emails that could damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

FBI agents discovered the offer shortly after stolen Democratic emails were released, and the events, along with ties between other Trump advisers and Russia, set off fears that the Trump campaign was conspiring with Russia’s interference.

The FBI did not use information from the CIA in opening the Russia investigation, former U.S. officials said. But agents’ views on Russia’s election interference operation crystallized by mid-August, after the CIA director at the time, John Brennan, shared intelligence with Comey about it.

The CIA did contribute heavily to the intelligence community’s assessment in early 2017 that Russia interfered in the 2016 election and tried to tip it in Trump’s favor, and law enforcement officials later used those findings to bolster their application for a wiretap on a Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page.

The special counsel who took over the Russia investigation in 2017, Robert Mueller, secured convictions or guilty pleas from a handful of Trump associates and indictments of more than two dozen Russians on charges related to their wide-ranging interference scheme.

In his report, Mueller said that he had “insufficient evidence” to determine whether Trump or his aides engaged in a criminal conspiracy with the Russians but that the campaign welcomed the sabotage and expected to benefit from it.

Barr is closely managing the Durham investigation, even traveling to Italy to seek help from officials there to run down an unfounded conspiracy that is at the heart of conservatives’ attacks on the Russia investigation — that the Italian government helped set up the Trump campaign adviser who was told in 2016 that the Russians had damaging information that could hurt Clinton’s campaign.

But Italy’s intelligence services told Barr that they played no such role in the events leading to the Russia investigation, Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte of Italy said in a news conference Wednesday. Barr has also contacted government officials in Britain and Australia about their roles in the early stages of the Russia investigation.

Revelations so far about Durham’s investigation have shown that he has focused in his first months on the accusations that Trump’s conservative allies have made about the origins of the Russia inquiry in their efforts to undermine it. Durham’s efforts have prompted criticism that he and Barr are trying to deliver the president a political victory, though investigators would typically run down all aspects of a case to complete a review of it.

Durham is running the investigation with a trusted aide, Nora R. Dannehy, and a pair of retired FBI agents. Other prosecutors are also assisting, people familiar with the investigation said.

In interviewing more than two dozen former and current FBI and intelligence officials, Durham’s investigators have asked about any anti-Trump bias among officials who worked on the Russia investigation and about one aspect of the investigation that was at the heart of highly contentious allegations that they abused their powers: the secret application seeking a court order for a wiretap on Page.

Law enforcement officials suspected Page was the target of recruitment by the Russian government, which he has denied.

Durham has also asked whether CIA officials might have somehow tricked the FBI into opening the Russia investigation.

Durham has indicated he wants to interview former officials who ran the CIA in 2016 but has yet to question either Brennan or James R. Clapper Jr., the former director of national intelligence. Trump has repeatedly attacked them as part of a vast conspiracy by the so-called deep state to stop him from winning the presidency.

Some CIA officials have retained criminal lawyers in anticipation of being interviewed. It was not clear whether Durham was scrutinizing other former top intelligence officials. Adm. Michael S. Rogers, former director of the National Security Agency, declined to say whether he had spoken with Durham’s investigators.

Durham also has yet to question many of the former FBI officials involved in opening the Russia investigation.

As Durham’s investigation moves forward, the Justice Department inspector general is wrapping up his own inquiry into aspects of the FBI’s conduct in the early days of the Russia investigation. Among other things, the inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, is scrutinizing the application for a warrant to wiretap Page.

Barr has not said whether Durham’s investigation grew out of the inspector general’s findings or something that prosecutors unearthed while doing interviews or reviewing documents. But the inspector general’s findings, which are expected to be made public in coming weeks, could contribute to the public’s understanding of why Durham might want to investigate national security officials’ activities in 2016.

Though the inspector general’s report deals with sensitive information, Horowitz anticipates that little of it will be blacked out when he releases the document publicly, he wrote in a letter sent to lawmakers on Thursday and obtained by The New York Times.

Durham has delved before into the secret world of intelligence gathering during the Bush and Obama administrations. He was asked in 2008 to investigate why the CIA destroyed tapes depicting detainees being tortured. The next year, Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Durham to spearhead an investigation into the CIA abuses.

Career prosecutors had already examined many of the same cases and declined to bring charges, and in an echo of the Russia investigation, they fumed that Holder was revisiting the issue. Rep. Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, then the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said that the abuses had been “exhaustively reviewed” and that a new inquiry could put national security at risk.

After nearly four years, Durham’s investigation ended with no charges against CIA officers, including two directly involved in the deaths of two detainees, angering human rights activists.

This article originally appeared in

Barr Refocuses Russian Inquiry on Own Agency

WASHINGTON — For more than two years, President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked the Russia investigation, portraying it as a hoax and illegal even months after the special counsel closed it. Now, Trump’s own Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into how it all began.

“We can never allow these treasonous acts happen to another president,” Trump said. He has called the FBI investigation one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history.

Barr expressed skepticism of the Russia investigation even before joining the Trump administration. Weeks after being was sworn in this year, he said he intended to scrutinize how it started and used the term “spying” to describe investigators’ surveillance of Trump campaign advisers. But he has been careful to say he wants to determine whether investigators acted lawfully.

Justice Dept. Is Said to Shift to Criminal Inquiry of Russia Investigation's Origins

Politics

Local

Filla

World

News

Football

Ghana Premier League

Black Stars

Sports

Celebrities

Music

Movies

Entertainment

Fashion

Beauty & Health

Relationships & Weddings

Food & Travel

Lifestyle

Domestic

International 

Business

About

Highlights

Selection Criteria

Jury

Terms And Conditions

FAQs

Pulse Influencer Awards

Explore categories

Pulse Ghana is the most followed news and entertainment platform, informing and engaging young Ghanaians round the clock, providing updates by the hour.

Katie Benner and Adam Goldman

Articles written by the author

Barr Refocuses Russian Inquiry on Own Agency

Justice Dept. Is Said to Shift to Criminal Inquiry of Russia Investigation's Origins