After a year filled with critically acclaimed movies from black directors like Spike Lee, Ryan Coogler and Barry Jenkins, the Golden Globes last night gave one of their two top film trophies to âGreen Book,â a racial-issues film from white âDumb and Dumberâ director Peter Farrelly.
The other top Globe went to âBohemian Rhapsody,â which pulled off a rare best-drama win without a best-director nomination, a split that happened mainly because the director of this critically dismissed film, Bryan Singer, was fired from the project midshoot.
You can always count on the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, a quirky group of around 90 foreign journalists who vote on the Golden Globes, to make some left-of-center picks. (Hey, the Globes are gonna Globe.) But now that the dust has settled from the best-comedy-or-musical win for âGreen Bookâ and best-drama victory for âBohemian Rhapsody,â your Carpetbagger is left wondering whether these choices are as unlikely as they might have seemed Sunday night.
Instead, should we treat them as emblematic of a mainstream sensibility that most moviegoers share? And, after recently seeking to reward more popular films, will the Oscars follow suit?
Before digging into these issues, I offer some caveats: The Hollywood Foreign Press shares only one member in common with the Oscar-voting academy, and the latter is a vastly larger organization, so one groupâs choices do not necessarily line up with what the other is inclined to reward.
Still, much of award season is about momentum, and it never hurts to be seen winning. Voting opened for the Oscar nominations Monday, and academy members weighing the crowded best-actress race will have last nightâs terrific speeches from Glenn Close and Olivia Colman at the top of their minds. Moments like those can make all the difference.
Given that, how might the Globes have bent the trajectories of several key Oscar contenders?
Certainly, they offer yet more proof that âBohemian Rhapsodyâ can actually penetrate Oscarâs best-picture race despite its well-known production problems. This biopic of Queen frontman Freddie Mercury has become a worldwide hit, and star Rami Malek, who also picked up a Globe for best actor in a drama, has chosen to address the Singer imbroglio mainly by not mentioning it at all.
At the filmâs first industry screening in October, Malek effusively thanked producer Graham King for spearheading the project, the sort of plaudits a leading man normally saves for his director.
That recontextualization appears to have worked: The Screen Actors Guild and Producers Guild of America both nominated the movie, and after the Globes gave âBohemian Rhapsodyâ even more momentum, it would now be a notable surprise if the film failed to make the best-picture lineup.
Still, itâs striking that âA Star Is Bornâ came up short Sunday night, winning only the best song Globe for its anthemic Bradley Cooper/Lady Gaga duet âShallow.â Given that âA Star Is Bornâ is a critically acclaimed story about show business that was also a huge hit with moviegoers, this film really ought to be steamrolling its way toward a best picture win. Yet year-end critics groups mainly gave it the cold shoulder, and the Globes followed suit. What gives?
Some of this may come down to campaigning. While Malek has shown up almost everywhere, happily spinning stories for interested voters, Cooper has proved to be a more recessive presence, and at many important events â like the star-studded Governors Awards in November â he was absent entirely.
It has fallen to Gaga to do the lionâs share of schmoozing, and she has proved to be a warm and able campaigner, yet her authenticity was still called into question by Globe hosts Andy Samberg and Sandra Oh, who poked fun at Gagaâs tendency to repeat a single canned line about Cooperâs belief in her.
The âA Star Is Bornâ team hoped Sunday night would be a coronation; instead, they got a light roast.
âGreen Bookâ and âBlack Pantherâ didnât compete in the same category at the Globes â the former won the best comedy-musical trophy, while the latter came up short in the best-drama race â yet I think the victory for âGreen Bookâ helps explain why âBlack Panther,â a cultural phenomenon, took no Globes. While this Marvel movie was a hit with critics, itâs still a superhero film, and industry voters may not be prepared to give that genre its top prize.
The fact-based âGreen Book,â on the other hand, is so familiar in its contours that many have likened it to previous award contenders like âDriving Miss Daisyâ and âThe Help.â This period story of an Italian-American bouncer (Viggo Mortensen) befriending a talented black pianist (Mahershala Ali) also picked up Globe nominations for both of its actors â âBlack Pantherâ managed none â as well as a win for Ali.
Both âGreen Bookâ and âBohemian Rhapsodyâ have found more favor with audiences than with critics, which is exactly the sort of skew the Oscars would prefer: Last summer, the academy infamously flirted with introducing an award for the best popular film, an attempt to pull focus from the critically acclaimed but underseen movies that often comprise much of the best-picture lineup. If âGreen Bookâ and âBohemian Rhapsodyâ are nominated for the Oscarsâ top prize alongside âA Star Is Bornâ and âBlack Panther,â the academy will be fielding its most populist slate in years.
And yet I wonder if the Globesâ real winner wasnât any of those movies but âRoma,â Alfonso CuarĂłnâs black-and-white art film. Though itâs not the sort of contender that usually wins best picture â it was made in a foreign language and is distributed by streaming service Netflix â many academy members love the film, and they may be even more inclined to give it their best-picture vote in the wake of Globe victories for âGreen Bookâ and âBohemian Rhapsody,â simply to demonstrate that the Oscars have a more highbrow sensibility.
At a time when the Oscar races often narrow, the Globes have done their part to keep this season wide open.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.