Election 2012 2012 election petition was an insult to petitioners - Maurice Ampaw

Maurice Ampaw said Presiding Judge Justice William Atuguba's verdict was an insult to Ghanaians

  • Published:
2012 election petition Presiding Judge, Justice William Atuguba play

2012 election petition Presiding Judge, Justice William Atuguba

24/7 Live - Subscribe to the Pulse Newsletter!

A private legal practitioner, Maurice Ampaw has described the verdict of the 2012 election petition by Nana Akufo-Addo and the New Patriotic Party (NPP) as an insult to the petitioners.

He said Presiding Judge Justice William Atuguba's verdict was an insult to Ghanaians.

His comments come at back of the Supreme Court in Kenya which has annulled the result of the recent presidential election.

The court cited irregularities and indicated that a new poll should be organized within 60 days.

READ MORE: Charlotte Osei battles fresh impeachment petition

Maurice Ampaw speaking on the development in Kenya said "If you read Justice William Atuguba’s verdict it is full of insults."

According to him, "he [William Atuguba] insulted Nana Addo and NPP that their petition is one of most useless petitions ever.

"When we have a clear case where the Constitution says 'Shall' then we have Atuguba interpreting it another way."

"Justice Atugaba led the Supreme Court to fail to uphold the law and constitution of the country," Maurice Ampaw said in an interview on Kumasi-based Hello FM.

Background to election petition

On August 29, 2013, Ghana experienced a landmark ruling in an eight month long prolonged tussle at the Supreme Court over the validity of the presidential results in the 2012 polls.

This follows the challenge of the 2012 presidential results by the NPP led by Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia.


READ ALSO: Here is why you should not blame Mahama for Kenya’s SC ruling

The NPP argued that they had every reason to believe that the results were rigged in favour of the National Democratic Congress’ (NDC) candidate Mahama.

They prayed the Court to declare their candidate, Nana Akufo-Addo as President with reasons that unpardonable malpractices and irregularities at 10,119 polling stations justified the nullification of 3,931,339 “invalid votes” which, the petitioners argued, would have beaten down John Mahama’s votes and overturned the declared results by the Electoral Commission.

According to the NPP’s pleadings, over-voting occurred at 1,722 polling stations, while voting without biometric verification occurred at 2,020 polling stations.

play Maurice Ampaw


They claimed presiding officers did not also sign pink sheets at 1,638 polling stations, while the use of duplicate serial numbers on pink sheets affected 8,987 polling stations.

The petitioners further argued that if the results of the 10,119 polling stations were annulled, President Mahama’s votes would have reduced by 2,622,551, which would have, in turn, beaten down the results declared by the Electoral Commission in his favour, to 41.79 per cent.

READ MORE: Mahama's court advice to Raila Odinga was motivated by self-interest - Amidu

They said although Nana Akufo-Addo’s votes would have, in like manner, been reduced by 1,233,186, he would have nonetheless secured 56.85 per cent, per their permutations, to cross the 50 per cent mark for victory.

But the court by a 5-4 majority decision justified why Mahama was validly elected.

There were four and three consistent judges who voted against and for the annulment of more than two million votes due to what the petitioners described as gross and widespread irregularities recorded during the election.

Justices William Atuguba, Mrs Justice Sophia Adinyira, Mr Justice N. S. Gbadegbe and Mrs Justice Vida Akoto-Bamfo in an overall decision dismissed the petitioners claims for the annulment of a total of 3,931,339 votes due to electoral irregularities in the December 7 and 8, 2012 presidential election.

The dissenting justices who held the view there were issues to be settled with allegations of over voting, absence of presiding officers’ signature and voting without biometric verification were Mr Justice Julius Ansah, Ms Justice Rose Constance Owusu and Mr Justice Anin Yeboah.

They declined to declare Nana Addo as the validly elected president, but held the view that the votes affected by these allegations must be annulled and a re-run held.

Do you ever witness news or have a story that should be featured on Pulse Ghana?
Submit your stories, pictures and videos to us now via WhatsApp: +233507713497, Social Media @pulseghana: #PulseEyewitness & DM or Email: eyewitness@pulse.com.gh.

Recommended Articles

Recommended Videos

Top Articles

1 RIP 'KABA is not dead': How his wife reacted to his deathbullet
2 Zimbabwe Matters Deal with crisis through 2018 elections - Kofi Annan...bullet
3 Inside Story This is what killed Asempa FM show host, KABAbullet
4 RIP Check out throwback photo of KABA from his secondary school daysbullet
5 Confusion NPP suspends four members over School Feeding brawlbullet
6 KABA’s Death Here is what Dr Bawumia wrote in KABA’s book of...bullet
7 RIP KABA, host of 'Ekosi Sen' on Asempa FM, deadbullet
8 Fighting Corruption Oye Lithur rejects Special Prosecutor...bullet
9 RIP KABA’s death a "big blow", GJA saysbullet
10 KABA Bawumia reacts to death of radio presenterbullet

Top Videos

1 Video Captain Smart CRIES over KABA’s deathbullet
2 Elections 2020 I'm ready to be the next President of Ghana – Asiedu Nketiabullet
3 Video Ex-president John Mahama preaches at Assemblies of God Churchbullet
4 No Appointment I'm ready to sweep the Flagstaff House for a fee -...bullet
5 Greedy Bastards NDC infiltrated by self-seeking opportunists –...bullet
6 Video Ken Agyapong vows to commit suicide if Mahama is not jailedbullet
7 Parliamentary Bribery Saga Opoku Prempeh insulted me – Suhuyinibullet
8 Video Appiah Stadium warns Mahama against his close associatesbullet
9 New Government Swearing in of Nana Akufo-Addo and Dr Bawumiabullet
10 Video Chaos erupts in Parliament over bribery reportbullet